voor Holten, door Holten

Kerkklokken beieren wereldwijd voor het klimaat

18

HOLTEN – Ook in Holten zullen op 13 december de kerkklokken beieren voor het klimaat.

Met dit klokgelui voeren de kerken, op de zondag vóór de beslissende laatste week van de klimaattop in Kopenhagen, actie voor een rechtvaardig en effectief mondiaal klimaatsakkoord In Nederland zal het klokgelui,evenals in Kopenhagen, om drie uur in de middag,aanvangen. De Raad van Kerken in Nederland roept zoveel mogelijk kerken op om mee te doen aan de actie, waartoe de Wereldraad van Kerken heeft op geroepen.

We willen met het luiden van de klokken duidelijk maken dat het de hoogste tijd is om een eind te maken aan de opwarming van de aarde. Van 7 tot 19 december spreken wereldleiders in Kopenhagen over een nieuw klimaatsverdrag, de opvolgen van Kyotoprotocol dat in 2012 afloopt.

Tegelijkertijd roepen de kerken de regeringsleiders, op de top op,om geld beschikbaar te stellen voor ontwikkelingslanden. Want juist de mensen in deze landen,die het minste hebben bijdragen aan de klimaatsverandering, worden nu het hardst getroffen, onder meer door overstromingen en oprukkende woestijnen.

18 Reacties
  1. hendry oolbekkink zegt

    ik denk dat ze er wel van onder de indruk zijn dat in holten de kerkklok luid.;-);-)

  2. hendry oolbekkink zegt

    ik denk dat ze er wel van onder de indruk zijn dat in holten de kerkklok luid.;-);-)

  3. Fred Gieter zegt

    Er is geen opwarming. Dat wil de politiek je doen geloven. Zure regen was een paar decenia de hype en nu de opwarming. Terwijl er ook wetenschappers bewijs hebben dat er een kleine ijstijd aankomt zoals tussen 1975 en 1990. Google daarmaar eens op.

    Die klokken vervuilen het dorp alleen maar met lawaai. Straks krijgen we een hype dat overdadig geluid de aarde aantast op een of andere manier 😀

  4. Fred Gieter zegt

    Er is geen opwarming. Dat wil de politiek je doen geloven. Zure regen was een paar decenia de hype en nu de opwarming. Terwijl er ook wetenschappers bewijs hebben dat er een kleine ijstijd aankomt zoals tussen 1975 en 1990. Google daarmaar eens op.

    Die klokken vervuilen het dorp alleen maar met lawaai. Straks krijgen we een hype dat overdadig geluid de aarde aantast op een of andere manier 😀

  5. J.Jansen zegt

    Adriaan Broere is een geofysicus .
    Hij woont in Goor.
    Hij wordt samen met vele wetenschappers doodgezwegen. Want de politiek heeft wereldwijd de opwarming van de aarde omarmt. Ik ben het overigens wel eens met de stelling dat we naar duurzame energie moeten.
    Maar die energie moet dan in onze westerse wereld worden opgewekt. Zodoende worden we sneller onafhankelijk van allerlei staten die politiek niet stabiel zijn.
    Overigens moeten we ons niet vergissen in de ontwikkelingen die nu al in het verre oosten gaande zijn. Ook daar zijn de zonnecollectoren massaal op de daken te zien.
    Onderstaand is een beetje Engels en lang maar wie belangstelling heeft moet het hier maar mee doen.
    Omdat de bijdrage in 1 keer te lang is zal ik hem in meerdere delen inzenden.

    There is no melting of hundreds of glaciers in the world. Ninety percent of more of the 160 000 glaciers in the world are advancing. The calving of ice you often see on TV is a advancing (growing) glacier that ends up in the ocean. You see no melting of ice but of the upper ice layer of the advancing glacier being pushed forward towards the coast. Because of the enormous thickness of the glacier it breaks off and tumbles downwards. These glaciers which end up in oceans are named Tidelands Glaciers.

    ————————-

    There is no increase of a global sea-level rise. The sea-level has been rising since the last ice age (18 000 years ago) and only rises a few millimetres per annum. There will be no flooding of islands and low-lying coasts as a result of this modest sea-level rise in the near-future.

    ————————-

    The ice caps on the North Pole and Antarctica are not melting and especially Antarctica shows lower temperatures. Open water with floating ice on the North Pole is not a phenomenon but a natural event in summer time. Polar bears can only live on the North Pole because they need open water to hunt seals. The Polar bear population has doubled during the last 15 years and is now a healthy 25 000.

    ———————

  6. J.Jansen zegt

    Adriaan Broere is een geofysicus .
    Hij woont in Goor.
    Hij wordt samen met vele wetenschappers doodgezwegen. Want de politiek heeft wereldwijd de opwarming van de aarde omarmt. Ik ben het overigens wel eens met de stelling dat we naar duurzame energie moeten.
    Maar die energie moet dan in onze westerse wereld worden opgewekt. Zodoende worden we sneller onafhankelijk van allerlei staten die politiek niet stabiel zijn.
    Overigens moeten we ons niet vergissen in de ontwikkelingen die nu al in het verre oosten gaande zijn. Ook daar zijn de zonnecollectoren massaal op de daken te zien.
    Onderstaand is een beetje Engels en lang maar wie belangstelling heeft moet het hier maar mee doen.
    Omdat de bijdrage in 1 keer te lang is zal ik hem in meerdere delen inzenden.

    There is no melting of hundreds of glaciers in the world. Ninety percent of more of the 160 000 glaciers in the world are advancing. The calving of ice you often see on TV is a advancing (growing) glacier that ends up in the ocean. You see no melting of ice but of the upper ice layer of the advancing glacier being pushed forward towards the coast. Because of the enormous thickness of the glacier it breaks off and tumbles downwards. These glaciers which end up in oceans are named Tidelands Glaciers.

    ————————-

    There is no increase of a global sea-level rise. The sea-level has been rising since the last ice age (18 000 years ago) and only rises a few millimetres per annum. There will be no flooding of islands and low-lying coasts as a result of this modest sea-level rise in the near-future.

    ————————-

    The ice caps on the North Pole and Antarctica are not melting and especially Antarctica shows lower temperatures. Open water with floating ice on the North Pole is not a phenomenon but a natural event in summer time. Polar bears can only live on the North Pole because they need open water to hunt seals. The Polar bear population has doubled during the last 15 years and is now a healthy 25 000.

    ———————

  7. J.Jansen zegt

    Deel 2
    THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING (Albert Einstein: Truth is wat stands the test of experience)
    by Adriaan Broere
    Adriaan Broere is an independent geophysicist and publicist. He is the author of the essay ‘Het Klimaat’ (The Climate) and of numerous articles about the atmospheric climate in Dutch newspapers and magazines.

    I am quite disturbed about the many publications on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) and the many scientific articles written about the atmospheric climate by well-known reputable scientists which are either being ignored or ridiculed.

    As a scientist myself, this has given me much frustration because science is my passion and I consider science an honest and ethical profession. I have written many articles, and essays about the climate for over more than 10 years and have experienced the same reactions as many of my colleagues. However, since a few months, I have noticed a change in attitude with government officials, the mass media, and audiences which I have addressed. This change of attitude has given me hope and the inspiration to continue my crusade for the true facts on the climate issue based on hard scientific evidence.

    I have also tried to analyse the reasons why most people have accepted the anthropogenic global warming theory (AGW) by the media and organizations such as the IPCC. Repeat something long enough and it becomes a consensus. My conclusion is that many people are indeed truly convinced about what is being advocated, often because of ignorance but also of a false consciousness of guilt about unfounded accusations by environmental radicals about what we are doing to the planet earth.

    It has become my conviction that for many people AGW has become a matter of religion, whereby IPCC’ s recent 400 –600 page report is the Holy Book, and the data generated by the climate models are the Scriptures, events that have not taken place yet but might happen in the far away future. I have noticed this in communicating with government officials, who without exception, refer to a worldwide consensus (‘the Science is settled’) as orchestrated by IPCC. Thousands of scientists opposed to the AGW are being treated as sceptical atheists. Faith in the climate gospel seems unprecedented and is only comparable with Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tale ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes ‘. Having realised and accepted this and the nonsense and futility of trading in CO2 emissions, it has helped me not to get upset anymore. A dozen politicians, including the Prime Minister, have replied to my latest essay with somewhat wavering reactions, which have given me hope that I may have seeded some doubt about IPCC’s reputation and predictions. Nevertheless, it remains depressing to see how global warming hysteria dominates the thinking of people who are world leaders and from whom one may expect to be more realistic and to have more common sense. A sad example is an ex Vice President like Al Gore attacking his own country for withstanding the voodoo cult!

    Here is some hard evidence, and facts that even IPCC can’t deny:

    Global Temperatures The satellite record is the highest quality temperature data series in the climate record. Microwave data from Tiros-N-satellites, in orbit since 1979, show no temperature increase but a slight decrease in temperature (-0.03 ºC per decennium) since 1998,( National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-NOAA). This is in agreement with the data from 1221 weather stations (U.S. Historical Climatologic Network Data (USHCN), NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies, and monthly NASA GISS data.

    The reliability and accuracy of these observed data is beyond dispute and are not comparable to computer data from climate models with only predictions, not facts, events that are supposed to occur in the next 20-50 years from now.

    Extreme Weather Conditions
    Extreme weather conditions are the norm and are no proof of climate changes. As an example take the period 1945-1977 when the average global temperature decreased and extreme weather conditions occurred with the same frequency as during the present time. (Cyclone Bangladesh; 1970; 200 000 deaths; – USA, 1974; 200 tornadoes; – hurricane Hazel Toronto; 85 people drowned; etc.) Less attention to these disasters was given then as there was no CNN with live pictures and (A)GW was not yet an issue.

  8. J.Jansen zegt

    Deel 2
    THE TRUTH ABOUT GLOBAL WARMING (Albert Einstein: Truth is wat stands the test of experience)
    by Adriaan Broere
    Adriaan Broere is an independent geophysicist and publicist. He is the author of the essay ‘Het Klimaat’ (The Climate) and of numerous articles about the atmospheric climate in Dutch newspapers and magazines.

    I am quite disturbed about the many publications on Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) and the many scientific articles written about the atmospheric climate by well-known reputable scientists which are either being ignored or ridiculed.

    As a scientist myself, this has given me much frustration because science is my passion and I consider science an honest and ethical profession. I have written many articles, and essays about the climate for over more than 10 years and have experienced the same reactions as many of my colleagues. However, since a few months, I have noticed a change in attitude with government officials, the mass media, and audiences which I have addressed. This change of attitude has given me hope and the inspiration to continue my crusade for the true facts on the climate issue based on hard scientific evidence.

    I have also tried to analyse the reasons why most people have accepted the anthropogenic global warming theory (AGW) by the media and organizations such as the IPCC. Repeat something long enough and it becomes a consensus. My conclusion is that many people are indeed truly convinced about what is being advocated, often because of ignorance but also of a false consciousness of guilt about unfounded accusations by environmental radicals about what we are doing to the planet earth.

    It has become my conviction that for many people AGW has become a matter of religion, whereby IPCC’ s recent 400 –600 page report is the Holy Book, and the data generated by the climate models are the Scriptures, events that have not taken place yet but might happen in the far away future. I have noticed this in communicating with government officials, who without exception, refer to a worldwide consensus (‘the Science is settled’) as orchestrated by IPCC. Thousands of scientists opposed to the AGW are being treated as sceptical atheists. Faith in the climate gospel seems unprecedented and is only comparable with Hans Christian Andersen’s fairy tale ‘The Emperor’s New Clothes ‘. Having realised and accepted this and the nonsense and futility of trading in CO2 emissions, it has helped me not to get upset anymore. A dozen politicians, including the Prime Minister, have replied to my latest essay with somewhat wavering reactions, which have given me hope that I may have seeded some doubt about IPCC’s reputation and predictions. Nevertheless, it remains depressing to see how global warming hysteria dominates the thinking of people who are world leaders and from whom one may expect to be more realistic and to have more common sense. A sad example is an ex Vice President like Al Gore attacking his own country for withstanding the voodoo cult!

    Here is some hard evidence, and facts that even IPCC can’t deny:

    Global Temperatures The satellite record is the highest quality temperature data series in the climate record. Microwave data from Tiros-N-satellites, in orbit since 1979, show no temperature increase but a slight decrease in temperature (-0.03 ºC per decennium) since 1998,( National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-NOAA). This is in agreement with the data from 1221 weather stations (U.S. Historical Climatologic Network Data (USHCN), NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies, and monthly NASA GISS data.

    The reliability and accuracy of these observed data is beyond dispute and are not comparable to computer data from climate models with only predictions, not facts, events that are supposed to occur in the next 20-50 years from now.

    Extreme Weather Conditions
    Extreme weather conditions are the norm and are no proof of climate changes. As an example take the period 1945-1977 when the average global temperature decreased and extreme weather conditions occurred with the same frequency as during the present time. (Cyclone Bangladesh; 1970; 200 000 deaths; – USA, 1974; 200 tornadoes; – hurricane Hazel Toronto; 85 people drowned; etc.) Less attention to these disasters was given then as there was no CNN with live pictures and (A)GW was not yet an issue.

  9. J.Jansen zegt

    Deel 3

    Temperature/Carbon Dioxide relation
    Also there was no direct correlation between global temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide for the period 1940-1977 when temperatures decreased and the CO2 level increased (IPCC chart with Mauna Loa measurements, Hawaii). What has become apparent from ice cores (Dome Concordia, & Vostok, Antarctica ), is that changes in temperature precede the changes in carbon dioxide by about 800 years, in other words CO2 lags temperature by hundreds of years. This may very well explain the increase of CO2 concentration during the 20th century, following a 800 year lag time after the preceding higher temperatures during the Medieval Warming Period (900-1300 A.D.), when it was 2 º- 4 ºC warmer than today and one of the most favourable periods in human history.

    Carbon dioxide , a beneficial gas.
    Contrary to what the media tries to thrust upon us as a pollutant, is carbon dioxide vital to our life on earth. Without greenhouse gasses our planet would be uninhabitable with temperatures -32 º C lower than our present average world temperature of 15º C. Carbon dioxide is also an essential natural substance for mankind, animals and plants. It enables acid buffering in our blood and digestion of our food. No production of urea would be possible without CO2; all essentialities the medical world will agree on. The fact is that the principal greenhouse gas is not CO2 but water vapour, which is present at much higher concentrations than CO2. Because of its re-radiation properties, long wave infrared absorption and being heavier than CO2, it will dominate the greenhouse effect in the lower altitudes. But it is CO2 that is named the culprit and for which humans are being blamed and financially punished with carbon taxes. The anthropogenic emission (increase) is so insignificant compared to natural carbon dioxide degassing that it can be ignored. Even NASA’s Dr. James Hansen, the world’s number one greenhouse guru, has made this statement but claimed instead methane as the problem.

    Climate Change
    Accepting the 1860-2006 temperature record (2007; Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia) as a best measure, we find that that there has been no increase in surface global temperature since the peak El Nino year of 1998. This result is confirmed by the two most reliable records of average global temperature, drawn from both weather balloon radiosondes (since 1958) and satellite-mounted microwave sounding units (MSU) since 1979. Of all these datasets, the MSU record is accepted to be the most accurate and globally representative. Once the effects of El Nino warming and volcanic cooling are allowed for, the records show no warming since satellite inception in 1979 (Gray, 2006). This conclusion is robust, none of the available datasets documents signify recent greenhouse warming despite continuing rises in atmospheric carbon dioxide. MSU data from satellites agree with weather balloons for 97 %. This minor discrepancy as a result that satellites register data 24-hours per day and balloons once or twice a day. How can people continue to boast about increasing global warming as no increase has been measured for nearly 9 years and a slight cooling is being recorded ? .

    What causes climate change ? Fluctuations in the influence of the sun cause variations in temperature and as temperature varies so too does the amount of CO2 (with the above mentioned lag time ) liberated from the oceans, which with 40 times the storage in the atmosphere is the largest CO2 reservoir on earth.
    We still live in an interglacial, the Holocene; a warm period between ice ages. The Holocene has lasted about 10 700 years which is already longer than most interglacials .The mid-Holocene, roughly 6000 years ago, was generally warmer than today. An increase of CO2 has nothing to do with climate change since as we have learned from ice cores that temperature proceeds changes in CO2 concentrations by about 800 years. An example is that during ice ages the concentration of CO2 was 16 – 20 higher than today’s concentration of 380 ppm (parts carbon dioxide per million parts air). More recently in 1820, during the Little Ice Age, the CO2 concentration was 440 ppm. based on 90 000 chemical measurements in the atmosphere between 1812 and 2004. There was no Al Gore then to do his scaremongering.!

  10. J.Jansen zegt

    Deel 3

    Temperature/Carbon Dioxide relation
    Also there was no direct correlation between global temperature and atmospheric carbon dioxide for the period 1940-1977 when temperatures decreased and the CO2 level increased (IPCC chart with Mauna Loa measurements, Hawaii). What has become apparent from ice cores (Dome Concordia, & Vostok, Antarctica ), is that changes in temperature precede the changes in carbon dioxide by about 800 years, in other words CO2 lags temperature by hundreds of years. This may very well explain the increase of CO2 concentration during the 20th century, following a 800 year lag time after the preceding higher temperatures during the Medieval Warming Period (900-1300 A.D.), when it was 2 º- 4 ºC warmer than today and one of the most favourable periods in human history.

    Carbon dioxide , a beneficial gas.
    Contrary to what the media tries to thrust upon us as a pollutant, is carbon dioxide vital to our life on earth. Without greenhouse gasses our planet would be uninhabitable with temperatures -32 º C lower than our present average world temperature of 15º C. Carbon dioxide is also an essential natural substance for mankind, animals and plants. It enables acid buffering in our blood and digestion of our food. No production of urea would be possible without CO2; all essentialities the medical world will agree on. The fact is that the principal greenhouse gas is not CO2 but water vapour, which is present at much higher concentrations than CO2. Because of its re-radiation properties, long wave infrared absorption and being heavier than CO2, it will dominate the greenhouse effect in the lower altitudes. But it is CO2 that is named the culprit and for which humans are being blamed and financially punished with carbon taxes. The anthropogenic emission (increase) is so insignificant compared to natural carbon dioxide degassing that it can be ignored. Even NASA’s Dr. James Hansen, the world’s number one greenhouse guru, has made this statement but claimed instead methane as the problem.

    Climate Change
    Accepting the 1860-2006 temperature record (2007; Climate Research Unit, University of East Anglia) as a best measure, we find that that there has been no increase in surface global temperature since the peak El Nino year of 1998. This result is confirmed by the two most reliable records of average global temperature, drawn from both weather balloon radiosondes (since 1958) and satellite-mounted microwave sounding units (MSU) since 1979. Of all these datasets, the MSU record is accepted to be the most accurate and globally representative. Once the effects of El Nino warming and volcanic cooling are allowed for, the records show no warming since satellite inception in 1979 (Gray, 2006). This conclusion is robust, none of the available datasets documents signify recent greenhouse warming despite continuing rises in atmospheric carbon dioxide. MSU data from satellites agree with weather balloons for 97 %. This minor discrepancy as a result that satellites register data 24-hours per day and balloons once or twice a day. How can people continue to boast about increasing global warming as no increase has been measured for nearly 9 years and a slight cooling is being recorded ? .

    What causes climate change ? Fluctuations in the influence of the sun cause variations in temperature and as temperature varies so too does the amount of CO2 (with the above mentioned lag time ) liberated from the oceans, which with 40 times the storage in the atmosphere is the largest CO2 reservoir on earth.
    We still live in an interglacial, the Holocene; a warm period between ice ages. The Holocene has lasted about 10 700 years which is already longer than most interglacials .The mid-Holocene, roughly 6000 years ago, was generally warmer than today. An increase of CO2 has nothing to do with climate change since as we have learned from ice cores that temperature proceeds changes in CO2 concentrations by about 800 years. An example is that during ice ages the concentration of CO2 was 16 – 20 higher than today’s concentration of 380 ppm (parts carbon dioxide per million parts air). More recently in 1820, during the Little Ice Age, the CO2 concentration was 440 ppm. based on 90 000 chemical measurements in the atmosphere between 1812 and 2004. There was no Al Gore then to do his scaremongering.!

  11. J.Jansen zegt

    Deel 4
    We have seen that from 1940 to 1975 the earth cooled while atmospheric carbon dioxide increased. Ice core data show that in all past warming events, temperature increases generally started about 800 years before the rises in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Causality does not run as IPCC and climate activists claim – it runs the opposite way ! This alone disproves the anthropogenic global warming theory, and that there is another cause of global warming other than carbon dioxide!

    Solar activities determine the temperature on earth. Long-term climate change is driven by insolation changes, from both orbital variations and intrinsic solar magnetic and luminosity variations. The length of the solar cycle (between 9.7 and 11.8 years) and temperature correspond. When the solar cycle is short, temperature rises, and when the cycle is long, activity is lower and temperature is lower The period known as the ‘Little Ice Age’. have been associated with the Maunder Minimum (extreme low temperatures) and another minimum, the Dalton Minimum, which occurred more recently between 1795 and 1825 and was shorter and less severe.

    The sun reverses magnetic polarity with each solar cycle. The average length of a solar cycle is 10.7 years. Sunspots of the new cycle start forming before the old cycle has completely died off and appear 12 to 20 months prior to the new cycle. Presently, we have a long solar cycle 23 ( about 12 years), its increased length supports the view that solar cycle 24 will be weak, with the consequence of increased certainty that there will be a global average temperature decline in the range of 1° to 2 ° C. This temperature response would be similar to that of the Dalton Minimum with a solar cycle of 13.6 years, but could also mean the beginning of a prolonged period of weak activity equating to a Maunder Minimum with even lower temperatures.

    Conclusions:

    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the former.
    Albert Einstein
    The cause of global warming has become a political issue instead of the realm of science, and politics seriously distort the science and are silencing critics of AGW. The integrity of the scientific community will win out in the end when global temperatures start dropping and the world has paid an enormous cost to curb carbon emissions. Journalists, who, perhaps out of ignorance, have misled their readers about the dangers of the greenhouse effect, will have to ask themselves how they could have been manipulated by the IPCC and climate activists.

    Politicians will express their anger and futility of the unnecessary and costly efforts to curb global warming. Hundred thousands people, most of them bureaucrats, but also many in science jobs making high wages, will lose their jobs and their trips to climate conferences in exotic locations.

    The experience will also show that climatology is a rigorous and complex scientific discipline and not an excuse for world-wide manipulations, scare stories, or a provider of disaster movie scenarios.

    References:
    David C. Archibald, Solar Cycles 24 and 25 and Climate Response Bond et al., 2001; Holzkamper et al., 2004 ; Holzhauer et al.,2005 ; Maasch et al., 2005; Soon, 2005. David Evans, I was on the global gravy train Prof. Marcel Leroux, Global Warming, Myth or Reality ! ; 2006. David C. Archibald, Climate Outlook to 2030.

  12. J.Jansen zegt

    Deel 4
    We have seen that from 1940 to 1975 the earth cooled while atmospheric carbon dioxide increased. Ice core data show that in all past warming events, temperature increases generally started about 800 years before the rises in atmospheric carbon dioxide. Causality does not run as IPCC and climate activists claim – it runs the opposite way ! This alone disproves the anthropogenic global warming theory, and that there is another cause of global warming other than carbon dioxide!

    Solar activities determine the temperature on earth. Long-term climate change is driven by insolation changes, from both orbital variations and intrinsic solar magnetic and luminosity variations. The length of the solar cycle (between 9.7 and 11.8 years) and temperature correspond. When the solar cycle is short, temperature rises, and when the cycle is long, activity is lower and temperature is lower The period known as the ‘Little Ice Age’. have been associated with the Maunder Minimum (extreme low temperatures) and another minimum, the Dalton Minimum, which occurred more recently between 1795 and 1825 and was shorter and less severe.

    The sun reverses magnetic polarity with each solar cycle. The average length of a solar cycle is 10.7 years. Sunspots of the new cycle start forming before the old cycle has completely died off and appear 12 to 20 months prior to the new cycle. Presently, we have a long solar cycle 23 ( about 12 years), its increased length supports the view that solar cycle 24 will be weak, with the consequence of increased certainty that there will be a global average temperature decline in the range of 1° to 2 ° C. This temperature response would be similar to that of the Dalton Minimum with a solar cycle of 13.6 years, but could also mean the beginning of a prolonged period of weak activity equating to a Maunder Minimum with even lower temperatures.

    Conclusions:

    Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I am not sure about the former.
    Albert Einstein
    The cause of global warming has become a political issue instead of the realm of science, and politics seriously distort the science and are silencing critics of AGW. The integrity of the scientific community will win out in the end when global temperatures start dropping and the world has paid an enormous cost to curb carbon emissions. Journalists, who, perhaps out of ignorance, have misled their readers about the dangers of the greenhouse effect, will have to ask themselves how they could have been manipulated by the IPCC and climate activists.

    Politicians will express their anger and futility of the unnecessary and costly efforts to curb global warming. Hundred thousands people, most of them bureaucrats, but also many in science jobs making high wages, will lose their jobs and their trips to climate conferences in exotic locations.

    The experience will also show that climatology is a rigorous and complex scientific discipline and not an excuse for world-wide manipulations, scare stories, or a provider of disaster movie scenarios.

    References:
    David C. Archibald, Solar Cycles 24 and 25 and Climate Response Bond et al., 2001; Holzkamper et al., 2004 ; Holzhauer et al.,2005 ; Maasch et al., 2005; Soon, 2005. David Evans, I was on the global gravy train Prof. Marcel Leroux, Global Warming, Myth or Reality ! ; 2006. David C. Archibald, Climate Outlook to 2030.

  13. J.Jansen zegt

    Kijk ook maar eens op:

    http://www.klimatosoof.nl/

    Dus geen klokken luiden of andere flauwekul.
    Aan de slag om ons zo snel mogelijk onafhankelijk te maken van politiek onbetrouwbare partners.

  14. J.Jansen zegt

    Kijk ook maar eens op:

    http://www.klimatosoof.nl/

    Dus geen klokken luiden of andere flauwekul.
    Aan de slag om ons zo snel mogelijk onafhankelijk te maken van politiek onbetrouwbare partners.

  15. Renee zegt

    Verder alles goed jo 😀

  16. Renee zegt

    Verder alles goed jo 😀

  17. henk.. zegt

    Ben het met de vorige sprekers eens, het is allemaal 1 hype.Dit wil natuurlijk niet zeggen dat we door mogen en kunnen gaan met vervuilen.
    Als we de wetenschappers moeten geloven zouden we 20 jaar geleden dood gaan aan zure regen. 10 jaar geleden doordat de ozon laag verdwijnt. En nu doordat de aarde opwarmt.

    Ik heb nieuws voor deze mensen. de aarde warmt al op sinds de laatste ijstijd………..

  18. henk.. zegt

    Ben het met de vorige sprekers eens, het is allemaal 1 hype.Dit wil natuurlijk niet zeggen dat we door mogen en kunnen gaan met vervuilen.
    Als we de wetenschappers moeten geloven zouden we 20 jaar geleden dood gaan aan zure regen. 10 jaar geleden doordat de ozon laag verdwijnt. En nu doordat de aarde opwarmt.

    Ik heb nieuws voor deze mensen. de aarde warmt al op sinds de laatste ijstijd………..

Laat een antwoord achter

Uw e-mailadres wordt niet gepubliceerd.